The Workbench · Craft
Chile's device registry runs on a list, not a class
This blog has already covered how Vietnam excuses two of its four device classes from agency review entirely, and how South Africa licenses the company years before it finishes licensing the device, one risk class at a time. Chile's own regulator, the Instituto de Salud Pública (ISP), runs a structure that doesn't split on class at all. A device's risk class only starts to matter once ISP has already named its category to a separate list — and a device sitting outside that list, at any risk level, doesn't get registered the way a classified device does.
The regulation and the list it runs on
Article 111 of Chile's Código Sanitario sets the statutory basis for controlling medical devices, and Decreto Supremo N° 825 of 1998, the Reglamento para el Control de los Dispositivos Médicos, is the regulation that actually operates it. DS 825/1998 sets up four risk classes, I through IV, running from low-risk items like bandages and manual surgical instruments up through implants like pacemakers. But the classes aren't a universal sorting test applied to every device sold in the country. They apply only to devices ISP has placed under “control sanitario obligatorio” — mandatory sanitary control — a named list of categories, not a blanket rule covering anything that meets a risk threshold.
Off the list means a lighter path, not no path
A device whose category hasn't been added to ISP's control list still has to reach the Chilean market through a real mechanism — it isn't simply unregulated. What it skips is the device-specific registro sanitario: the company bringing it in still needs its own establishment-level sanitary authorization as a manufacturer, importer, or distributor, the same base layer every regulated company in Chile carries regardless of which devices it sells. The device itself just never goes through ISP's own file-by-file registration, because that step only exists for categories the list actually names.
Registration, once it applies, runs through SAFIS on a three-year clock
For a listed category, registration runs through ISP's own SAFIS platform, and the registro sanitario it issues is valid for three years before it has to be renewed. That term and that intake channel are the same regardless of which of the four classes the device falls into — the class shapes what evidence the file has to carry, not how long the registration lasts or where it gets filed.
The list just grew, and the growth wasn't a class change
Decreto Exento N° 25 of 2026, published in Chile's Diario Oficial in March 2026, added 39 new device and IVD categories to the control sanitario obligatorio list. None of this touched DS 825/1998's four-class structure or the three-year registration term; it simply named more categories the regime now reaches. The decree also set a phased compliance runway rather than an immediate cutover, giving companies already selling a newly listed category time to bring it into registration instead of pulling it from the market the day the decree published. A device-portfolio tracker that logged Chile as “establishment-authorization only, no registration required” before March 2026 needs that entry revisited now, category by category, against the expanded list — not against the device's risk class, which never changed.
Where this meets the file
A Chile row in a cross-border registration tracker needs two facts a device's GHTF-style risk class can't supply on its own: whether the device's specific category currently sits on ISP's control sanitario obligatorio list, and the date it was added if the answer is recent. A registration tracker built around that structure, alongside the launch catalog's other cross-border templates, is previewed there now. If your program tracks Chile's list differently, the shelf takes that correction directly.
The Regulatory Toolkit launches soon — a free shelf of source-mapped templates, checklists and browser-only tools for regulatory teams. Get one email when it opens, or contribute a template.